So despite my enthusiasm for gardening, my passion for food and my
burning desire to build an urban homestead, I have a confession to make:
I'm actually kind of a sham.
I've never had my own garden before this
year, and have never been very good at keeping plants alive in general.
But this year, I was determined to change things. I bought a
bunch of planters and organic soil. I carefully consulted the back of
my seed packets to figure out where and when to plant some late-season direct-sowing plants. I eagerly planted, watered, waited.
A few days ago, I discovered the first seedlings sprouting up from
where I had planted them! I was so excited! I sat and watched them,
waxing poetical in my mind about the miracle of nature, the amazing
power to create something edible from a humble seed, sunlight, dirt and
water. It was exhilarating.
But as the days passed, I started
to get a little uneasy. None of the other seeds I'd planted seemed to
be sprouting. And then I saw those same seedlings cropping up in other
areas, where I hadn't planted. And after a little inspection, I
realized that those seedlings looked suspiciously similar to the weeds
growing all around the backyard.
Looks like I've been lovingly fawning over and tending to a bunch of goat-head bearing weeds.
On the bright side, the plants I bought are doing well. The bush basil and chocolate mint looked pretty pathetic after transplanting, but they've perked right up after a few weeks of consistent watering. The rosemary looks beautiful, the strawberry is growing (though I doubt it will make berries this year, at this rate) and the tomato plant has two little tomatoes growing on it.
It's definitely a learning process.
And right now, I'm very grateful that I am not actually relying on this food to survive. This is another one of those areas where it's important to remember privilege. It would be very easy for a person with gardening experience to look at people spending money on groceries and say, "Why waste all of that money when you could grow it yourself?" And while growing your own food is a very worthwhile goal, it's not something that's going to be happening overnight.
So: How is your garden faring this year?
Showing posts with label privilege. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privilege. Show all posts
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Monday, July 7, 2014
Why the Supreme Court's Ruling About Hobby Lobby Scares the Shit Out of Me
This is sort of old news by now, but in the days following the Supreme Court's ruling, thinking about it made me too sick to my stomach to form coherent, blog-worthy thoughts. It's taken a while for all of it to really sink in, for my impulsive anger to reside enough that I could explain in plain English why exactly this ruling is so fucking terrifying.
So in case you've been under a rock, here's the deal. Under the Affordable Care Act, employers are required to offer insurance coverage to their employees. That coverage has to meet certain basic guidelines to ensure that everyone gets the same quality of coverage. And part of what's covered by that insurance mandate is several forms of birth control, including Plan B, Ella and two types of IUD. With me so far?
Okay. So Hobby Lobby -- a store founded on Christian values -- objected to being forced to pay for this coverage because these forms of birth control violate their pro-life stance. To clarify, the contraceptives covered by ACA insurance are not abortion pills, by the medical definition of abortion. An abortion is medically defined as the destruction of a fertilized egg that has already attached to the uterine wall. None of the birth control methods mentioned above do that. Instead, in some way or another, all of them prevent eggs from being fertilized in the first place, or prevent a fertilized egg from implanting.
All the same, the Supreme Court ruled that it was against the law to require businesses to offer contraceptive coverage that went against the owner's religious beliefs.
As you might expect, a lot of people have a lot of opinions about this, on all sides -- questions about religious freedom, reproductive rights, and whether your employer should have a say in your healthcare. I'm not going to get into that here, because I think there's a bigger issue that we need to examine. Because I don't think this case was about religion at all.
Thanks to Corporate Personhood, businesses have the same rights as individuals. And apparently, if the precedent set by this most recent landmark case is anything to go off of, a corporation's rights can supersede the rights of its employees.
Make no mistake. Hobby Lobby doesn't give a shit about birth control. If it did, it would not have invested so much of its money into the pharmaceutical companies that create the very products it refuses to cover through insurance. The issue isn't about the corporation's values -- it's an issue of money, power and control.
Granting corporations so many rights is dangerous, in part because corporations have a whole lot more power than individuals. Part of the reason that individuals have rights in the first place is to protect the weak from the strong. Without some sort of protection, there is nothing to stop those with power and authority from enslaving or otherwise abusing those who can't fight back.
Corporations have more money than individuals. They have more power. And thanks to the Super-Pacs, they have immense political pull.
If you're not familiar with feudalism, here's the way it's basically laid out: At the top, you have a monarch. Below him are a cluster of noblemen. These people would be granted ownership of land within the kingdom, in exchange for them providing soldiers to the king's army. The lands owned by the noblemen would be populated by nobles and knights, certainly, but there'd be a much higher percentage of peasants. These peasants would live on these lands, but they would have no rights to them. They would grow crops, but most of what they grew would be the property of the nobleman whose lands they tilled. There was no upward mobility. There was only long, arduous hours of back-breaking labor in exchange for a subsistence lifestyle and the persistent threat of abuse from noblemen.
It seems to me that corporations are the new noblemen. They're the Lords and Ladies of the modern age.
The so-called "working poor" (which, in these times of the vanishing middle class, means most of us) are share-croppers, peasants tilling the land of the big corporations. Except instead of growing sheep and turnips, we're growing cash. We keep just enough of it to survive, and the rest goes up to those landowners -- who in turn give some of their money to the government in exchange for the freedom to keep doing what they're doing.
Think on it. Read Nick Hanauer's article. Consider it long and hard and tell me honestly if that's a reality you want to see come to pass. If not, you and I and everyone else needs to start making some noise. We need to become champions for our own rights while we still have the chance, before things get nasty enough for a full-blown revolution.
So in case you've been under a rock, here's the deal. Under the Affordable Care Act, employers are required to offer insurance coverage to their employees. That coverage has to meet certain basic guidelines to ensure that everyone gets the same quality of coverage. And part of what's covered by that insurance mandate is several forms of birth control, including Plan B, Ella and two types of IUD. With me so far?
Okay. So Hobby Lobby -- a store founded on Christian values -- objected to being forced to pay for this coverage because these forms of birth control violate their pro-life stance. To clarify, the contraceptives covered by ACA insurance are not abortion pills, by the medical definition of abortion. An abortion is medically defined as the destruction of a fertilized egg that has already attached to the uterine wall. None of the birth control methods mentioned above do that. Instead, in some way or another, all of them prevent eggs from being fertilized in the first place, or prevent a fertilized egg from implanting.
All the same, the Supreme Court ruled that it was against the law to require businesses to offer contraceptive coverage that went against the owner's religious beliefs.
As you might expect, a lot of people have a lot of opinions about this, on all sides -- questions about religious freedom, reproductive rights, and whether your employer should have a say in your healthcare. I'm not going to get into that here, because I think there's a bigger issue that we need to examine. Because I don't think this case was about religion at all.
Corporations Are Not People
....but the Supreme Court seems to think they are.Thanks to Corporate Personhood, businesses have the same rights as individuals. And apparently, if the precedent set by this most recent landmark case is anything to go off of, a corporation's rights can supersede the rights of its employees.
Make no mistake. Hobby Lobby doesn't give a shit about birth control. If it did, it would not have invested so much of its money into the pharmaceutical companies that create the very products it refuses to cover through insurance. The issue isn't about the corporation's values -- it's an issue of money, power and control.
Granting corporations so many rights is dangerous, in part because corporations have a whole lot more power than individuals. Part of the reason that individuals have rights in the first place is to protect the weak from the strong. Without some sort of protection, there is nothing to stop those with power and authority from enslaving or otherwise abusing those who can't fight back.
Corporations have more money than individuals. They have more power. And thanks to the Super-Pacs, they have immense political pull.
Ushering in a New Age of Feudalism
Wealth inequality is a major problem in our country. Today, I read a brilliant blog post from "ultra-rich man" Nick Hanauer that said exactly what I've been thinking for years: If we don't do something to stop it, we will enter another feudal era.If you're not familiar with feudalism, here's the way it's basically laid out: At the top, you have a monarch. Below him are a cluster of noblemen. These people would be granted ownership of land within the kingdom, in exchange for them providing soldiers to the king's army. The lands owned by the noblemen would be populated by nobles and knights, certainly, but there'd be a much higher percentage of peasants. These peasants would live on these lands, but they would have no rights to them. They would grow crops, but most of what they grew would be the property of the nobleman whose lands they tilled. There was no upward mobility. There was only long, arduous hours of back-breaking labor in exchange for a subsistence lifestyle and the persistent threat of abuse from noblemen.
It seems to me that corporations are the new noblemen. They're the Lords and Ladies of the modern age.
The so-called "working poor" (which, in these times of the vanishing middle class, means most of us) are share-croppers, peasants tilling the land of the big corporations. Except instead of growing sheep and turnips, we're growing cash. We keep just enough of it to survive, and the rest goes up to those landowners -- who in turn give some of their money to the government in exchange for the freedom to keep doing what they're doing.
Think on it. Read Nick Hanauer's article. Consider it long and hard and tell me honestly if that's a reality you want to see come to pass. If not, you and I and everyone else needs to start making some noise. We need to become champions for our own rights while we still have the chance, before things get nasty enough for a full-blown revolution.
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
The Privilege of Frugality
For many years, I've been involved in rat rescue. Once, I had the pleasure of meeting a fellow rat-enthusiast (a rare event) and we had a long talk about our rodent friends and how much we loved them, what it was that made them so special.
My new friend made a point that I had never considered: "Rats are just such a bourgeois pet. In other places in the world, people have to try hard to keep rats out of their homes. It's a matter of survival. Here, we're so far removed from that, we can actually keep them as pets. We can afford to feed and love and cherish something that other people are threatened by."
That stuck with me. He's right, of course: Keeping rats is the epitome of privilege.
And, in many ways, frugality is also a position of privilege.
There are several privileges that can make it easier to live frugally:
Owning Your Privilege
Privilege isn't something you need to be ashamed of or guilty about. It's not something you need to apologize for. Often, it's something you have no control over -- your gender, the part of the world you were born in, the socioeconomic status of your parents.
But it is something you need to be aware of, and it's something that you need to realize not everyone shares. That's the crucial part: You cannot dismiss people who do not share your privilege as being "stupid" or "lazy" or "unworthy" because they are working with a different set of skills than you are.
What you can do is listen to people who have different experiences, and try to appreciate where they're coming from. And you can use your privilege to help make things easier for others -- whether that means teaching someone a skill that you have, or participating in a grass roots program to make changes to your community.
We all have voices. They all deserve to be heard. And flaunting your privilege silences the voices of the people around you. So next time you start to lose patience with the way someone else lives, or the questions they ask, or the mistakes they make, try to take a step back and remember that they might not have what you do. Instead of degrading them, listen to them -- and then think about what you can do to make the world a better place for people like them.
My new friend made a point that I had never considered: "Rats are just such a bourgeois pet. In other places in the world, people have to try hard to keep rats out of their homes. It's a matter of survival. Here, we're so far removed from that, we can actually keep them as pets. We can afford to feed and love and cherish something that other people are threatened by."
That stuck with me. He's right, of course: Keeping rats is the epitome of privilege.
And, in many ways, frugality is also a position of privilege.
What is Privilege, Anyway?
Privilege is a term that gets used frequently in discussions of race and gender, but it's not limited to those spheres at all. Privilege is something all of us have, and all of us need to be aware of. Essentially, privilege is something that you have that makes certain things easier for you than others who do not have it. If you are privileged, you're operating on "easy mode," while people without those same privileges are operating on a harder setting.There are several privileges that can make it easier to live frugally:
- Having some extra money in the bank so you can do things like stock up in bulk when you find a good sale.
- Experience with handling money, such as learning money management skills from your parents.
- A working spouse with a good enough job to enable the other person to stay home and home-make.
- Good health, enabling you to complete projects around the home or simply avoid spending so much on medical bills.
- Access to resources that can teach you new skills -- the internet, library books, community classes.
- The space to grow your own food.
- For that matter, the space to store and cook meals at home, and the knowledge of how to do that.
Owning Your Privilege
Privilege isn't something you need to be ashamed of or guilty about. It's not something you need to apologize for. Often, it's something you have no control over -- your gender, the part of the world you were born in, the socioeconomic status of your parents.
But it is something you need to be aware of, and it's something that you need to realize not everyone shares. That's the crucial part: You cannot dismiss people who do not share your privilege as being "stupid" or "lazy" or "unworthy" because they are working with a different set of skills than you are.
What you can do is listen to people who have different experiences, and try to appreciate where they're coming from. And you can use your privilege to help make things easier for others -- whether that means teaching someone a skill that you have, or participating in a grass roots program to make changes to your community.
We all have voices. They all deserve to be heard. And flaunting your privilege silences the voices of the people around you. So next time you start to lose patience with the way someone else lives, or the questions they ask, or the mistakes they make, try to take a step back and remember that they might not have what you do. Instead of degrading them, listen to them -- and then think about what you can do to make the world a better place for people like them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)